An online database of camouflage used by 
United State Naval Warships during WWII


THE DEVELOPMENT OF NAVAL CAMOUFLAGE 1914-1945 
PART VI CONCLUSION 

By Alan Raven 

(Article reprinted courtesy of Plastic Ship Modeler Magazine issue #97/3)

In the Mediterranean in late 1944 British destroyers began to have the roof area of their bridges painted a bright yellow in order to assist recognition by friendly aircraft. One of the ships so painted was the Hunt class destroyer BELVOIR. On her first trip with this feature she was bombed in error (without result) by an American Liberator bomber. Upon the ship returning to port the captain sought out the aircraft responsible, the crew of which explained that the yellow areas had made an excellent aiming point, and that they were unaware of the use of yellow as an aid to aircraft recognition. The captain of BELVOIR had the yellow areas painted back to the standard grey!

One of the most singular instances of recognition markings as an aid to aircraft occurred in September 1943 at the invasion of Salerno, involving the British cruiser UGANDA. Of the cruisers on the gun line, the UGANDA was about the most heavily fitted with anti-aircraft weaponry, so the UGANDA’s captain decided to paint the roofs of the three triple 6” turrets gloss white. In this way he felt that the enemy aircraft would pick out the UGANDA, attack the ship, and be shot down because of UGANDA’s ability to put up a very heavy concentration of anti-aircraft fire! UGANDA had this feature for about ten days while giving close support for troops ashore. At the end of this time the turret roofs were painted back to the normal color. It was reported to the author that the crew breathed a collective sigh of relief when this happened!

On at least one occasion vessel IFF markings were used to try to deceive the enemy! The case in point was the wearing of diagonal bands of red and white across the bows of the British destroyers SIKH and ZULU during the commando raid on Tobruk on the night of 13/14 September 1942. During the raid itself, the SIKH was sunk by AA batteries ashore, and ZULU was sunk a few hours later by aircraft while retreating from the scene.

MUNSELL BOOK OF COLORS

For those modelers who wish to view the Munsell Book of Colors, 1929 edition, the following institutions hold a copy. This is by no means a complete list. Check with your local university library or public library system. There are many more, and probably one is available in your area.

(I) U,S. Postal Service Library - Washington D.C. 
(II) Rochester Institute of Technology - New York. 
(III) Massachusetts College Of Art - Massachusetts.
(IV) National Library Of Medicine - Maryland. 
(V) Mercer County Community College - New Jersey. 
(VI) Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - New York 
(VII) Smithsonian Institute - Washington D.C. 
(VlII) Emory University - Georgia. 
(IX) University of Maryland - Maryland. 
(X) Minneapolis Public Library - Minnesota. 
(XI) University of N. Carolina, Greensboro - North Carolina. 
(XII) University of New Hampshire - New Hampshire. 
(XIII) Wright Laboratory Technical Library - Ohio. 
(XIV) Philadelphia College of Textiles & Science- Pennsylvania. 
(XV) Southern Methodist University Central Library - Texas. 
(XVI) University of California - Los Angeles - California. 
(XVII) University of California - Berkeley - California. 
(XVIII) Dept. Of Transportation Library - Washington D.C. 
(XlX) Wheaton College - Massachusetts. 
(XX) Washington University - Missouri. 
(XXI) Duke University - North Carolina. 
(XXII) University of Nebraska - Lincoln - Nebraska. 
(XXIII) Newark Public Library - New Jersey. 
(XXIV) Ohio State University - Wooster College - Ohio. 
(XXV) Drexer University - Pennsylvania.

NOTES ON ARTWORK

Because of the tremendous variety of styles, types, and ship by ship variation, the following illustrations represent only a tiny sample of British camouflage usage during World War II. These ships patterns shown here are ones that have never been published before and are split between official and unofficial designs, with some interesting variations mixed in. Readers may notice in some instances the tonal qualities are different from the correct ones. As the artwork is reproduced in black and white, it was necessary in order to distinguish easily between colors. A good example of this is the pattern for the cruiser KENYA, where the difference in tone on the artwork between the two shades of Mountbatten Pink has been exaggerated.

Although some pieces of art are of outline only, they are reasonably accurate and the arrangement of patterns can be used with a degree of confidence. For those wishing to construct detailed models, a degree of research will be required in order to ascertain precise configuration. The author hopes that in these cases, the results will be shared through publication.  

The camouflage worn by the destroyers ROCKINGHAM MONTGOMERY, and HIGHLANDER, illustrates well the types of variations of the Peter Scott style of camouflage, whereby the concealment aspect has largely been lost through the use of dark tones. Evidence strongly suggests that the use of unof6cial colors and patterns on escorts was widespread in 1941,1942, and well into 1943.

Back Page ] Home ] Table of Contents ] Next Page ]